1.2 同行评议的模式

在本期课程中，我们将分别介绍同行评议的四种模式，即单盲, 双盲, 三盲和开放式评议之间的区别和它们各自的优缺点。我们同样也将探讨内部同行评审和外部同行评审之间的不同之处。

1.1 什么是同行评议？为什么有同行评议？

为了使您更充分地理解和学习这系列同行评议课程，在探讨如何进行审稿之前，我们首先回头追溯学术出版的发展历程来解释说明同行评议的现状。我们将在本节课程中深入挖掘同行评议的起源、流程，使您了解在评审人评阅之前论文会经过的步骤。我们同时探讨同行评议的意义，分享评审人和编辑在阅读论文时注重哪些要点。

1.4 如何参与同行评议

通过本节课程的学习，您将了解到如何参与同行评议并为促进学界互信和学术发展贡献自己的力量。

Enabling inclusive sharing of knowledge for SDGs. Innovations introduced at Elsevier at the nexus of gender, sustainability, and development research communication

Mr Chi reports on the actions taken by Elsevier as a research publisher, employer and leader in science data analytics to advance gender equality in science knowledge making and communication.&nbsp

UN SDGs and the Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs) on Gender: What Countries are Reporting and What is Missing in VNRs

Prof Kim explains what can be learned from monitoring progress in achieving SDGs at national level. So far, both the interest and the level of achievement have been very disappointing.

Integrating gender perspectives into the planning, execution and evaluation phases of military operations and exercises

Rebecca Blum explains  the relationship between sexual violence and peace and security.  NATO defines sexual or gender-based violence against an individual or group of individuals, as act

Gender empowerment of the society improves resilience in disaster management

Prof Chung explains that disasters are rarely gender neural. Women and girls are the main victims of natural disasters.

test webinar certificate

4.1 The Role of Publishers

In this module, Jessica Miles, Head of Speed of Publication Program at Elsevier focuses on the significance of the SAGER Guidelines for publishers.

4.2 Concerns by Editors and Publishers

In this module, Sanne Peters discusses the concerns of Editors and Publishers regarding the implementation of the SAGER Guidelines, and offers recommendations to overcome some of these barriers.