Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
55 m
Going through peer review
How do editors look at your paper?
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- (-) Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Career planning
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Open science
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- Becoming a peer reviewer
- Book writing
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Editor webinars
- Finding the right journal
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Social impact
- Going through peer review
- Research design
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Research metrics
- Career guidance
- The Lancet
- 释放您的研究潜能
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Societies Publishing
- (-) 认证同行评议课程
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- Research data management
- Writing skills
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Job search
- Ethics
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of peer review
- 学习
Type
Language
Language
17 results
1.2 同行评议的模式
在本期课程中，我们将分别介绍同行评议的四种模式，即单盲, 双盲, 三盲和开放式评议之间的区别和它们各自的优缺点。我们同样也将探讨内部同行评审和外部同行评审之间的不同之处。
1.1 什么是同行评议？为什么有同行评议？
为了使您更充分地理解和学习这系列同行评议课程，在探讨如何进行审稿之前，我们首先回头追溯学术出版的发展历程来解释说明同行评议的现状。我们将在本节课程中深入挖掘同行评议的起源、流程，使您了解在评审人评阅之前论文会经过的步骤。我们同时探讨同行评议的意义，分享评审人和编辑在阅读论文时注重哪些要点。
1.4 如何参与同行评议
通过本节课程的学习，您将了解到如何参与同行评议并为促进学界互信和学术发展贡献自己的力量。
Global climate technology cooperation efforts under the UNFCCC as a government funded research institute and the meaning of gender-mainstreaming
Dr Kim considers global gender mainstreaming efforts needed to advance plans for technology response to climate change, with qualitative and quantitative data using sex-disaggregated information.
Theme 4 Introduction
Kye Young Lee introduces the efforts and opportunities for gender-mainstreaming efforts made by two UNFCCC constituted bodies, the Climate Technology Centre & Network (CTCN) and the Green Clima
1.3 同行评议流程介绍
本节课程将常规的同行评议流程从论文提交到评议人的选择分环节进行讲解，并分别介绍同行评议过程里涉及到的各方人员的角色与责任，以及作为评议人您要承担的职责。
GCF's Gender Policy and Implementation
Seblewongel Negussie explains the processes to integrate gender assessment and gender action plans as requirements across internal functions, all interventions, mitigation & adaptation activiti
Ireland’s role in championing gender-responsive climate action, in policy and development programmes
Michelle Winthrop explains the National Strategy for women and girls in Ireland and connects this strategy to the National Climate Action Plan.
Implications for Korea on implementing its future gender-mainstreaming strategies for climate technology cooperation with developing countries on the basis of the gender-mainstreaming efforts of the CTCN and the GCF
Dr Oh explains how gender mainstreaming is implemented in cooperation projects with developing countries. The requirements is that the applicant includes goals to achieve gender equality in cross-
2.0 我刚收到一个审稿邀请， 接下来如何？
在本节课程中，我们将会为您梳理从收到审稿邀请到进行论文评阅的过程。在接受或拒绝审稿邀请之前您需要考虑到利益冲突、可能存在的偏见和您空余时间的多少。此外我们将分别介绍决定接受或拒绝审稿邀请之后应该采取的步骤。
3.1 怎样撰写一份有帮助的同行评议报告
撰写同行评议报告可能是同行评议的过程中最重要的环节，在本节课程中我们将详尽地介绍作为评议人您对作者该如何做出评价、评议报告的撰写规范和学术伦理上的考量。此外，我们也将解释您如何向编辑做出私密评论、给出推荐意见和它们的具体含义。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.