Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
58 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Career guidance
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Societies Publishing
- 认证同行评议课程
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- Research data management
- Writing skills
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- (-) Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Job search
- Research metrics
- The Lancet
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Career planning
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Open science
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- Becoming a peer reviewer
- Finding the right journal
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Going through peer review
- Research design
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 学习
Type
Language
Language
20 results
How to write case reports
Case reports provide valuable information by throwing light on rare and unusual clinical presentations, symptoms or diseases.
An editor’s guide to writing a review article
Writing a compelling review article is about more than picking an interesting topic and gathering the latest references.
如何将学位论文转变成可发表的期刊文章？
撰写期刊文章的过程与撰写学位论文之间存在很大的差异，本模块旨在为潜在作者，尤其是最近刚完成学位论文的作者提供将学位论文转化为期刊文章的建议。 在本次研讨会中，《儿科护理学》期刊主编Cecily Betz博士和塔夫茨大学社区健康系助理教授Adolfo Cuevas博士将分享如何编辑学位论文使得您能够将它进行发表。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：基于信任的期刊同行评审
自同行评审制度诞生起，这种基于互信的评审方式保障了科研学术成果的真实性、重要性和原创性，成为了科研出版体系中的核心环节。随着科学研究，尤其是科学信息传播的重要性在当今社会生活中愈发凸显且受到广泛关注，我们有必要重新思考与审视信任在整个科学研究体系内的关键性作用，探讨如何能够更好地构建科研群体及大众对科学的整体信任感。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：信任与科研评审制度
评审制度是开展各种科研活动、进行学术交流并确保科研成果质量的必经环节和有力保障。
科研职业发展与性别多元化
在所有影响个体科研职业发展的因素中，性别在近些年来越来越多地被人们所提及。爱思唯尔发布的《从性别角度看科研人员的研究生涯》报告显示，在生命科学和心理学等许多领域，女性科学家发表的论文已经占据了多数，但在整体论文发表量、引用量、获得资助、合作和认可程度方面，女性和男性科研人员之间不平等的现象依然存在。
Make the most of your research: publish your data & methods
From data collection, sampling choices and methodological considerations, there are many parts of your research that deserve more attention than they get in traditional journal articles.
How to write for an interdisciplinary audience
As a researcher, you may have a story to tell that contributes not just to members of your own specific field of study, but that is of interest to a wider international interdisciplinary audienc
学术出版入门：如何在投稿前准备您的论文
大部分研究者永远都忘不了第一次发表论文时的喜悦和满足感，但是我们的第一次尝试并不总是以成功告终，而是很有可能带来失败和沮丧。面对许多期刊的高拒稿率，在递交之前先了解一些基础信息和知识会有助于您提高论文被接受的几率。
论文准备基础：如何撰写摘要以提高稿件质量
在撰写论文摘要上投入时间和精力是大有道理的，它将成为几个关键决定的基础：编辑是否会把您的论文送出审稿；审稿人是否接受审稿邀请；其他研究者是否会阅读您发表的论文。除非您的文章是开放存取的，否则标题和摘要是唯一可以免费提供给所有人阅读的部分。不要忘了，您的文章被阅读的次数越多，被进一步引用的机会就越大，所以，写好论文摘要至关重要。
Systematic reviews 101
Systematic reviews are used to rigorously analyze and aggregate current research to answer a question based on making best use of existing evidence rather than commissioning new primary studies.
科研职业选择及生涯规划
随着竞争压力日益加剧，今日的研究者们往往不再局限于过去在大学等学术机构任职的传统路径，而是面对着更加纷繁多样的就业选择。与之相对的是，要在科研领域找到一份适合自己的工作愈发具有挑战性。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.