Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
37 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Societies Publishing
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- The Lancet
- Career guidance
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- (-) Editor Essentials
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- 认证同行评议课程
- Finding the right journal
- Research data management
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Open science
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Job search
- Research metrics
- (-) Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Writing skills
- Career planning
- Ensuring visibility
- (-) Fundamentals of publishing
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- Becoming a peer reviewer
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Scopus
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Research design
- Going through peer review
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 中文课程
Type
Language
Language
40 results
Guest editors
Guest editors play a vital role in curating high-quality contributions on a particular topic and driving the editorial review process for special issue publications.
Lessons from the Gender Asset Gap Project
Prof Doss explains how assets are shared between women and men and that joint ownership does not imply equality. Legal frameworks affect how data can be interpreted, e.g. marital property rights.
如何将学位论文转变成可发表的期刊文章？
撰写期刊文章的过程与撰写学位论文之间存在很大的差异，本模块旨在为潜在作者，尤其是最近刚完成学位论文的作者提供将学位论文转化为期刊文章的建议。 在本次研讨会中，《儿科护理学》期刊主编Cecily Betz博士和塔夫茨大学社区健康系助理教授Adolfo Cuevas博士将分享如何编辑学位论文使得您能够将它进行发表。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：基于信任的期刊同行评审
自同行评审制度诞生起，这种基于互信的评审方式保障了科研学术成果的真实性、重要性和原创性，成为了科研出版体系中的核心环节。随着科学研究，尤其是科学信息传播的重要性在当今社会生活中愈发凸显且受到广泛关注，我们有必要重新思考与审视信任在整个科学研究体系内的关键性作用，探讨如何能够更好地构建科研群体及大众对科学的整体信任感。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：信任与科研评审制度
评审制度是开展各种科研活动、进行学术交流并确保科研成果质量的必经环节和有力保障。
科研职业发展与性别多元化
在所有影响个体科研职业发展的因素中，性别在近些年来越来越多地被人们所提及。爱思唯尔发布的《从性别角度看科研人员的研究生涯》报告显示，在生命科学和心理学等许多领域，女性科学家发表的论文已经占据了多数，但在整体论文发表量、引用量、获得资助、合作和认可程度方面，女性和男性科研人员之间不平等的现象依然存在。
Getting started
This module walks a new Editor through the initial steps and considerations of taking on a journal as the Editor-in-Chief.
Publishing ethics
This module gives editors an overview of the central concepts of publication ethics and point out some things to look out for when editing a journal.
Commissioning content & special issues
Both new and established journals can benefit from directly commissioned content or special issues.
10 reasons to get – and use – an ORCID iD
Names are far from unique. With an ORCID iD, researchers can benefit from being properly identified.
Gender Bias in academic publishing
Unconscious gender bias: what is it and what can we do to make the publishing process fairer for all?
写作技巧：如何为论文写一封有说服力的投稿信
提交论文的时候如果没有投稿信或者投稿信的内容不完整会影响到您投稿成功与否。一封有说服力的投稿信能够行之有效地使编辑了解您的研究，以及您的论文如何契合期刊的内容并推进学科的发展。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.