Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
58 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Career guidance
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Societies Publishing
- 认证同行评议课程
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- Research data management
- (-) Writing skills
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Job search
- Research metrics
- (-) The Lancet
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Career planning
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Open science
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- (-) Becoming a peer reviewer
- Finding the right journal
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Going through peer review
- Research design
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 学习
Type
Language
Language
32 results
The Lancet Group - the best science to help you improve lives
Please note: the first part of this webinar, Dr. Ceschia’s presentation, was not recorded.
Modernising haematological malignancy adverse event assessment and reporting
Remarkable improvements in outcomes for many haematological malignancies have been driven primarily by a proliferation of novel therapeutics over the past two decades.
Urban design, transport, and health
We are pleased to invite you to the global launch of the Lancet Global Health Series on urban design, transport, and health.
How to prepare a proposal for a review article
At many journals, the process for submitting a review article is much different from the process for a research article: rather than uploading your research manuscript and clicking Submit, it might
如何使用恰當的學術語言
糟糕的語言品質可能會延後甚至造成稿件不被出版。若編輯們與審稿者們無法理解你的英文，他們將無法抓到你的研究重要影響或是訊息。即便你的研究能夠拓展新視野，糟糕的語言品質代表著你可能無法得到相對的認識。
寫作技巧：如何進行跨學科論文寫作
隨著跨學科研究成為當前學術研究的一大趨勢，對研究者而言，很多時候研究話題並不局限於一個特定的研究領域。相比起普通的學術論文，跨學科研究面向更國際化也更廣泛多樣來自各學科領域的研究群體。在進行跨學科研究時，研究過程中的各個環節，從語言的運用、文章的架構到研究範圍的確定都對研究者提出了挑戰。
寫作技巧：如何為論文寫一封有說服力的投稿信
投稿論文的時候如果沒有投稿信或者投稿信的內容不完整會影響到您投稿成功與否。一封有說服力的投稿信能夠有效地讓編輯了解您的研究，以及您的論文如何契合期刊的內容並推進學科的發展。
科研职业发展与性别多元化
在所有影响个体科研职业发展的因素中，性别在近些年来越来越多地被人们所提及。爱思唯尔发布的《从性别角度看科研人员的研究生涯》报告显示，在生命科学和心理学等许多领域，女性科学家发表的论文已经占据了多数，但在整体论文发表量、引用量、获得资助、合作和认可程度方面，女性和男性科研人员之间不平等的现象依然存在。
Sustainable care for children with cancer: a Lancet Oncology Commission
Cancer kills more than 100,000 children each year, and yet 80% of paediatric cancers are curable with currently available interventions.
Emerging technologies and clinical research in Latin America
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, and an increasing threat in low-income and middle-income countries.
解锁CiteScore 2019: 如何正确使用期刊评价指标
对于科研人员来说，在寻找适合自己研究的期刊时往往要结合期刊评价指标来了解期刊的学术水准以及发表在内的论文质量。期刊评价指标已经被大家广泛接受甚至正式成为科研评价体系中对科研成果进行衡量的关键因素。另一方面，随着期刊评价体系日益完善，越来越多的新指标出现在大家的视野中，如何正确使用期刊评价指标来对期刊的学术实力进行全面客观的评价成为了研究者需要掌握的技能。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：信任与科研评审制度
评审制度是开展各种科研活动、进行学术交流并确保科研成果质量的必经环节和有力保障。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.