Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
58 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Career guidance
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- (-) Societies Publishing
- 认证同行评议课程
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- Research data management
- Writing skills
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Job search
- Research metrics
- The Lancet
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Career planning
- Fundamentals of publishing
- (-) Open science
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- (-) Becoming a peer reviewer
- Finding the right journal
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Going through peer review
- Research design
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- (-) Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 学习
Type
Language
Language
34 results
How to submit and publish an OA article
In this module, we provide hands-on guidance for those who are ready to publish open access.
Cost of publishing open access: how and why
In light of the 15th anniversary of International Open Access Week, Researcher Academy is launching a three-part module series aiming to give early career researchers an entry point into the world
Fundamentals of open access
In light of the 15th anniversary of International Open Access Week, Researcher Academy is launching a three-part module series aiming to give early career researchers an entry point into the world
Ethical Issues in the Dissemination of Genomic Science: Perspectives from Genetics in Medicine
International collaborations have long been an important element of genomic science.
How to Become a Successful Researcher At Every Stage of Your Career
Pursuing a career as a physician-scientist can be daunting, especially as the success rates for securing research grants has declined from 33% to 19%, while the number of grant applications has inc
科研职业发展与性别多元化
在所有影响个体科研职业发展的因素中，性别在近些年来越来越多地被人们所提及。爱思唯尔发布的《从性别角度看科研人员的研究生涯》报告显示，在生命科学和心理学等许多领域，女性科学家发表的论文已经占据了多数，但在整体论文发表量、引用量、获得资助、合作和认可程度方面，女性和男性科研人员之间不平等的现象依然存在。
解锁CiteScore 2019: 如何正确使用期刊评价指标
对于科研人员来说，在寻找适合自己研究的期刊时往往要结合期刊评价指标来了解期刊的学术水准以及发表在内的论文质量。期刊评价指标已经被大家广泛接受甚至正式成为科研评价体系中对科研成果进行衡量的关键因素。另一方面，随着期刊评价体系日益完善，越来越多的新指标出现在大家的视野中，如何正确使用期刊评价指标来对期刊的学术实力进行全面客观的评价成为了研究者需要掌握的技能。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：信任与科研评审制度
评审制度是开展各种科研活动、进行学术交流并确保科研成果质量的必经环节和有力保障。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：基于信任的期刊同行评审
自同行评审制度诞生起，这种基于互信的评审方式保障了科研学术成果的真实性、重要性和原创性，成为了科研出版体系中的核心环节。随着科学研究，尤其是科学信息传播的重要性在当今社会生活中愈发凸显且受到广泛关注，我们有必要重新思考与审视信任在整个科学研究体系内的关键性作用，探讨如何能够更好地构建科研群体及大众对科学的整体信任感。
如何将学位论文转变成可发表的期刊文章？
撰写期刊文章的过程与撰写学位论文之间存在很大的差异，本模块旨在为潜在作者，尤其是最近刚完成学位论文的作者提供将学位论文转化为期刊文章的建议。 在本次研讨会中，《儿科护理学》期刊主编Cecily Betz博士和塔夫茨大学社区健康系助理教授Adolfo Cuevas博士将分享如何编辑学位论文使得您能够将它进行发表。
Distinguished Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
In this Plenary Session, the subject of improving the implementation of SDGs is addressed by political and science policy leaders in the Republic of Korea and Europe.
Clinical Cases & Social Media: Tips & Techniques
Learn how to prepare your clinical case for successful submission and get tips on how to ensure visibility of your findings for the benefit of wider public using social media with Dr. Julia Grapsa, Editor-in-Chief, JACC: Case Reports and Dr. Mary Norine Walsh, President, American College of Cardiology.
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.