Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
37 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- (-) Societies Publishing
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- The Lancet
- Career guidance
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- 认证同行评议课程
- Finding the right journal
- Research data management
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Open science
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Job search
- Research metrics
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Writing skills
- Career planning
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- (-) Becoming a peer reviewer
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Scopus
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Research design
- (-) Going through peer review
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 中文课程
Type
Language
Language
40 results
How do editors look at your paper?
Getting published isn’t easy. We help level the playing field by revealing what an editor really wants.
How reviewers become editors
Ambitions to be a journal editor one day? Discover why reviewing is a vital step in that journey.
How to become a reviewer and what do editors expect?
Want to get involved in peer review? We explain how.
10 tips for writing a truly terrible review
Keen to brush up your reviewing skills? We start by explaining what not to do.
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.
写作技巧：如何为论文写一封有说服力的投稿信
提交论文的时候如果没有投稿信或者投稿信的内容不完整会影响到您投稿成功与否。一封有说服力的投稿信能够行之有效地使编辑了解您的研究，以及您的论文如何契合期刊的内容并推进学科的发展。
学术出版入门：如何在投稿前准备您的论文
大部分研究者永远都忘不了第一次发表论文时的喜悦和满足感，但是我们的第一次尝试并不总是以成功告终，而是很有可能带来失败和沮丧。面对许多期刊的高拒稿率，在递交之前先了解一些基础信息和知识会有助于您提高论文被接受的几率。
生涯规划：我该选择什么研究专业和领域？
选择什么研究专业和领域有时是一个让人十分纠结的决定。即使已经毕业了您都可能对自己之前选择的领域并不确定，在思考现在想要换个研究方向是否已经太迟。来自莱顿大学的Christine L. Mummery教授告诉我们，为时未晚。她本人由物理学和生物物理学转向干细胞生物学，而她的两名同僚分别是从英语语言文学和历史学进入了这个领域。
提高影响力：参加学术会议的必备技巧
学术会议构成了科学研究中不可分割的重要部分，无论是想要分享研究成果还是想要跟进领域内的最新动态，大多数研究者的科研生涯中都免不了要去参加学术会议。
写作技巧：如何进行交叉学科论文写作
随着交叉学科研究成为当前学术研究的一大趋势，对研究者而言，很多时候研究话题并不局限于一个特定的研究领域。相比起普通的学术论文，交叉学科研究面向更国际化也更广泛多样来自各学科领域的研究群体。在进行交叉学科研究时，研究过程中的各个环节，从语言的运用、文章的架构到研究范围的确定都对研究者提出了挑战。
Expert Tips for Publishing in JACC Journals and Cardiovascular Health Promotion
Learn about techniques and strategies for publishing in JACC Journals and tips for developing papers for high-impact publications with Valentin Fuster, MD, PhD, Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC).
论文准备基础：如何撰写摘要以提高稿件质量
在撰写论文摘要上投入时间和精力是大有道理的，它将成为几个关键决定的基础：编辑是否会把您的论文送出审稿；审稿人是否接受审稿邀请；其他研究者是否会阅读您发表的论文。除非您的文章是开放存取的，否则标题和摘要是唯一可以免费提供给所有人阅读的部分。不要忘了，您的文章被阅读的次数越多，被进一步引用的机会就越大，所以，写好论文摘要至关重要。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.