Search
354 results
New
Part 2: How to value expert feedback during peer review?
Understand the critical role of reviewer feedback in enhancing your research and facilitating your publication, even if it doesn’t necessarily lead to acceptance.
Why you can't afford to ignore publication ethics
How publishing ethics can help make or break a researcher’s career.
Seven strategies for scientists to communicate their research and create a brand
With societal impact being the primary goal of research, asking researchers to create a brand for themselves might sound counter-intuitive.
How to secure funding - ECR edition
The first step to funding your research or getting the dream fellowship is writing the perfect application.
How to write for an interdisciplinary audience
As a researcher, you may have a story to tell that contributes not just to members of your own specific field of study, but that is of interest to a wider international interdisciplinary audience.
1.2 Models of peer review
In this section, we discuss the various models of peer review and break down the difference between single/double/triple anonymized and all identities visible review, and discuss their strong suits
1.3 The typical peer review process
This section breaks down the typical peer review process by discussing the steps from submission to the selection of reviewers by the editors.
How to conduct evidence-based research
It’s natural to think that all research is evidence based given the long citation lists that research papers come with.
How do I prepare for the next step?
How do you take decisions regarding your professional future as a researcher? Making a career in academia can be challenging and it's natural to feel like you don't see the complete picture.