Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
37 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- Societies Publishing
- (-) 释放您的研究潜能
- The Lancet
- Career guidance
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- 认证同行评议课程
- Finding the right journal
- (-) Research data management
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- Ethics
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Open science
- (-) Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Job search
- Research metrics
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Writing skills
- Career planning
- Ensuring visibility
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- Becoming a peer reviewer
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Scopus
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Research design
- Going through peer review
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 中文课程
Type
Language
Language
33 results
稿件状态知多少——Decision: 投稿决定阶段详解
投稿Decision阶段是许多研究者们最关心的部分。简单来说，这个阶段就像是拆“盲盒”，研究者们的投稿结果究竟如何，在本阶段可以知道结果。
稿件状态知多少——Editorial Process: 审稿状态详解
研究者们的稿件投递成功后会进入Editorial Process，在这个状态下，稿件状态进展依次会变更为with editor、under review和required reviews complete。
稿件状态知多少——Pre-Submit: 稿件提交前和提交时经历的四种状态
稿件状态是许多研究者们一直关心的问题。本模块旨在为研究者们，尤其是为近期计划投稿或已经投稿的作者们科普稿件投递后的相关知识。
Make your data reusable - It's Not FAIR! Improving Data Publishing Practices in Research
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable - The FAIR Data Principles. Likely you’ve heard about FAIR, but do you know how it can support you and your own research?
Make your data interoperable - It's Not FAIR! Improving Data Publishing Practices in Research
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable - The FAIR Data Principles. Likely you’ve heard about FAIR, but do you know how it can support you and your own research?
Make your data accessible -It's Not FAIR! Improving Data Publishing Practices in Research
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable - The FAIR Data Principles. Likely you’ve heard about FAIR, but do you know how it can support you and your own research?
Make your data findable- It's Not FAIR! Improving Data Publishing Practices in Research
Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable - The FAIR Data Principles. Likely you’ve heard about FAIR, but do you know how it can support you and your own research?
如何使用恰當的學術語言
糟糕的語言品質可能會延後甚至造成稿件不被出版。若編輯們與審稿者們無法理解你的英文，他們將無法抓到你的研究重要影響或是訊息。即便你的研究能夠拓展新視野，糟糕的語言品質代表著你可能無法得到相對的認識。
科研职业发展与性别多元化
在所有影响个体科研职业发展的因素中，性别在近些年来越来越多地被人们所提及。爱思唯尔发布的《从性别角度看科研人员的研究生涯》报告显示，在生命科学和心理学等许多领域，女性科学家发表的论文已经占据了多数，但在整体论文发表量、引用量、获得资助、合作和认可程度方面，女性和男性科研人员之间不平等的现象依然存在。
How to design effective figures for review articles
A great research article or review is about more than listing research results: it is about telling a story through the data or giving your readers some insight they could not get from reading the
解锁CiteScore 2019: 如何正确使用期刊评价指标
对于科研人员来说，在寻找适合自己研究的期刊时往往要结合期刊评价指标来了解期刊的学术水准以及发表在内的论文质量。期刊评价指标已经被大家广泛接受甚至正式成为科研评价体系中对科研成果进行衡量的关键因素。另一方面，随着期刊评价体系日益完善，越来越多的新指标出现在大家的视野中，如何正确使用期刊评价指标来对期刊的学术实力进行全面客观的评价成为了研究者需要掌握的技能。
2020同行评议周专题研讨会：信任与科研评审制度
评审制度是开展各种科研活动、进行学术交流并确保科研成果质量的必经环节和有力保障。
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.