Learn
Researcher Academy provides free access to countless e-learning resources designed to support researchers on every step of their research journey. Browse our extensive module catalogue to uncover a world of knowledge, and earn certificates and rewards as you progress.
37 m
Going through peer review
How to respond to reviewers' comments
Filters
Topic
Topic
- Cell Press
- (-) Career guidance
- 释放您的研究潜能
- Certified Peer Reviewer Course
- Editor Essentials
- Societies Publishing
- (-) 认证同行评议课程
- Finding the right journal
- Fundamentals of manuscript preparation
- Research data management
- Writing skills
- Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) Guidelines
- Theme 8: Advancing Science and Inclusive Career Pathways in Sustainability-related Emerging Research and Innovation Fields
- (-) Ethics
- Fundamentals of peer review
- Technical writing skills
- Theme 6: Developing and Applying Methods of Sex/Gender Analysis in Research for SDGs
- Theme 7: Adding Value by Exploiting Cross Cutting and Spill-over Benefits of Gendered Innovations
- Theme 9: Shaping the Next 10 Years of Research and Interventions for SDGs
- Ensuring visibility
- Inclusion and Diversity for Researchers
- Job search
- Research metrics
- The Lancet
- Theme 2: Improving Data Collection, and Reliability of Statistics and Indicators on Gender with Intersectionality Dimensions
- (-) Theme 3: Strengthening Science and Technology for Better Response to Societal Inequalities, Disruptions, and Emergencies
- Theme 4: Global Climate Technology Cooperation Projects and Gender-Mainstreaming Efforts
- Career planning
- Fundamentals of publishing
- Open science
- Social impact
- Theme 1: Uniting Funders, Doers, and Custodians of Research to Strategically and Comprehensively Advance Quality Gender Research for SDGs
- Theme 5: Science for Peace and for Safe and Secure Societies
- Becoming a peer reviewer
- Publishing in the Chemical Sciences
- Book writing
- Editor Webinars
- Funding
- Research collaborations
- Going through peer review
- Research design
- 19th Gender Summit - Global for SDGs : Day 1
- Editor Webinar Series – Learning & Content Management
- Plenary Session with Mr BAN Ki-Moon
- 学习
Type
Language
Language
33 results
1.2 同行评议的模式
在本期课程中，我们将分别介绍同行评议的四种模式，即单盲, 双盲, 三盲和开放式评议之间的区别和它们各自的优缺点。我们同样也将探讨内部同行评审和外部同行评审之间的不同之处。
1.1 什么是同行评议？为什么有同行评议？
为了使您更充分地理解和学习这系列同行评议课程，在探讨如何进行审稿之前，我们首先回头追溯学术出版的发展历程来解释说明同行评议的现状。我们将在本节课程中深入挖掘同行评议的起源、流程，使您了解在评审人评阅之前论文会经过的步骤。我们同时探讨同行评议的意义，分享评审人和编辑在阅读论文时注重哪些要点。
1.4 如何参与同行评议
通过本节课程的学习，您将了解到如何参与同行评议并为促进学界互信和学术发展贡献自己的力量。
Podcast: 5 tips for researchers to support a healthy research career
Making an impact through research is an important goal of many researchers, but this goal might impact or hamper healthy and sustainable work patterns.
Gender aspects of COVID-19 and the need for better data
Dr Mahmood raises attention of the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: what are the gender dimensions of this crisis?
What is burnout and how to address it
Burnout is not a new phenomenon, but its increased visibility has given the issue more focus and light, especially in high-stress related fields and professions.
How to transit from Academia to Industry?
There are different reasons why people switch from academia to industry but the decisions, questions and the process remain similar.
Plagiarism: Decision making & dealing with grey-zones across academic Fields
Plagiarism is often considered a classic form of scientific misconduct.
How to select a supervisor
Your supervisor plays an important role in shaping the early years of your career so finding the right one is crucial.
Thinking outside the box
A senior scientist explains why you should never be afraid to break the mould.
Choosing a career in academia or industry
To move or not to move – we run through some of the pros and cons.
Why you can't afford to ignore publication ethics
How publishing ethics can help make or break a researcher’s career.
Going through peer review
When you’ve already invested so much time in your manuscript, it’s not always easy to hear that a reviewer thinks it needs more work. In these modules, we provide some useful advice on how to deal with those reviewer comments and keep your submission moving smoothly through the publishing process. You will learn the initial steps you should take, and the correct tone and language to use in your response letter. We also help you see your manuscript through the eyes of an editor and reviewer, so you can spot any shortfalls or mistakes before you submit.
What you will learn
- Practical advice on how to respond to reviewers
- An explanation of what reviewers are looking for
- Tips on looking at your submission with a critical eye
2 modules
How to respond to reviewers' comments
It’s not easy to receive feedback on your submission but we have plenty of top tips to help you respond.